StocksNY
1. Valuation Metrics (Score: 8/10)
-
P/E Ratio
Ford’s P/E ratio has historically been on the lower side relative to the overall market and often in line (or slightly cheaper) than major auto peers like General Motors. This suggests the market is pricing in cyclical and execution risks but also offers potential value if Ford can deliver consistent results. -
P/B Ratio
The company’s price-to-book ratio often hovers around 1 or slightly above, which is relatively modest for an asset-heavy automaker. -
Dividend Yield
Ford’s dividend yield tends to be higher than the S&P 500 average (often in the 3–5% range). The payout ratio is usually not excessive (though it can spike during downturns), indicating some commitment to returning capital to shareholders.
Why 8/10? Ford is generally “cheap” on traditional metrics, especially compared to many in the market, but the cyclical nature of autos keeps it from a perfect score.
2. Financial Health (Score: 6/10)
-
Debt-to-Equity Ratio
Automakers typically carry substantial debt, especially when they also have financing arms (Ford Credit). Compared to pure manufacturing companies, Ford’s debt looks high, but it’s closer to industry norms once you account for the financing business. -
Current Ratio
Historically around 1.2–1.3, which is acceptable but not particularly robust (>1.5 is preferable for a cushion). -
Profit Margins
Ford’s margins can be volatile. Gross and operating margins have been somewhat stable in North America but face challenges internationally. The push into EVs also affects margins due to high R&D and capital expenditure demands.
Why 6/10? Debt is a normal part of Ford’s business model, but the company’s liquidity metrics and margin stability aren’t as strong or predictable as one might like.
3. Growth Potential (Score: 7/10)
-
Revenue & EPS Growth
Historically cyclical. However, Ford is positioning itself in the growing EV segment and connected-car technologies, which could drive new growth paths. -
Forward Guidance
Analyst estimates have been mixed. There is optimism around EV launches and Ford’s push into commercial electric vehicles, but caution remains about profitability in those segments.
Why 7/10? The shift to EVs (and advanced tech) is a genuine growth opportunity, but execution risks and stiff competition from established players and newer entrants (Tesla, Rivian, etc.) temper the score.
4. Cash Flow Strength (Score: 7/10)
-
Free Cash Flow (FCF)
Ford usually generates respectable FCF, but it can swing significantly with auto sales cycles and large capital expenditures for new models and EV initiatives. -
FCF Yield
Often compares favorably to many industrial stocks. When Ford’s share price dips, its FCF yield can look attractive.
Why 7/10? They do generate substantial cash in strong economic conditions, but the heavy capex needed for EV expansion will be a sizable near-term cash outflow.
5. Industry Position (Score: 8/10)
-
Competitive Moats
Ford has a strong global brand—particularly in pickups (F-Series) and commercial vehicles. This brand strength is a significant competitive moat in key markets like North America. -
Market Share
The F-Series remains the best-selling truck in the U.S., giving Ford solid market share in a highly profitable segment. The company’s presence in commercial fleets also offers a stable revenue base.
Why 8/10? A century-plus of history, iconic models, and a loyal customer base give Ford substantial industry clout, even though competition is intensifying.
6. Management & Governance (Score: 7/10)
-
Track Record
CEO Jim Farley has placed a major emphasis on EVs and tech, continuing the initiatives begun under previous leadership. Execution has been decent so far, though not without supply-chain hiccups. -
ESG Score
Automotive manufacturing is inherently scrutinized for emissions and labor practices. Ford’s public commitments to EVs and sustainability are a plus, but the industry remains carbon-intensive.
Why 7/10? Leadership has been proactive in restructuring and R&D, and no major governance red flags stand out. Still, the auto industry’s ESG challenges cap the upside.
7. Risk Factors (Score: 5/10)
-
Beta
Automakers often have a Beta > 1, meaning higher volatility than the broader market. Ford’s stock price historically moves with economic sentiment and cyclical consumer spending. -
Sector Risks
The auto industry is cyclical, sensitive to interest rates, consumer credit, commodity prices, and global supply chains (e.g., chip shortages). Emerging competition in EVs adds another layer of risk.
Why 5/10? Autos remain one of the most cyclical industries. Despite Ford’s strong brand, exposure to economic downturns, supply-chain constraints, and the EV transition keep risk levels elevated.
8. Market Sentiment (Score: 6/10)
-
News/Events
Recent attention focuses on Ford’s EV rollouts (Lightning, Mustang Mach-E) and whether the company can scale production efficiently. Labor negotiations with unions also affect sentiment. -
RSI Indicator
Technical readings vary over time, but as of recent trends, Ford’s stock often trades in a neutral-to-slightly oversold zone when macro fears flare up, then rebounds with positive news on sales.
Why 6/10? Sentiment is neither extremely bullish nor bearish. Investors see potential but are cautious about near-term economic headwinds and execution on EV expansions.
9. Margin of Safety (Score: 7/10)
- Intrinsic Value
Valuations (via standard DCF or dividend discount models) often suggest some upside if Ford can maintain stable cash flows. Because the stock is relatively low-priced (by multiples), there can be a margin of safety if economic conditions remain stable.
Why 7/10? The stock frequently trades at conservative multiples, hinting that much of the cyclical risk is baked in. However, autos can quickly re-rate down on macro or execution misses.
10. Peer Comparison (Score: 7/10)
-
Key Multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, ROE)
Ford’s P/E and EV/EBITDA are often in the same ballpark as GM and Stellantis. ROE can be decent but is more erratic due to the cyclical nature of net income. -
Against Legacy & New EV Players
Against GM, Toyota, VW, and newer EV pure-plays (Tesla, Rivian), Ford’s valuation looks cheaper in many respects; however, Tesla, for instance, commands a premium for faster growth.
Why 7/10? Ford does not stand out as drastically undervalued compared to other legacy automakers, but it’s also not overvalued relative to them. It’s generally in a competitive spot.
Total Score: 68/100
- Pros: Attractive traditional valuation metrics, a strong brand and truck lineup, decent free cash flow in good times, and a serious push into EVs.
- Cons: Cyclical exposure, heavy capex for EV ramp, potential margin pressure, and high volatility relative to the market.
With a score of 68/100, Ford appears to be a reasonably valued, globally recognized automaker with upside potential if its EV strategy and operational efficiencies bear fruit. However, investors must be comfortable with the inherent cyclicality and competitive pressures of the automotive industry.
Given these rough scores, Walgreens Boots Alliance lands in the middle zone—not an outright “sell,” but definitely not a strong “buy” either, without clear signs of renewed growth or stronger margins. The company’s legacy pharmacy business still has a solid footprint, and the valuation is appealing from a pure multiple standpoint. However, sentiment is negative, leadership is in transition, and growth strategies are not yet proven.
If you’re a value-oriented, contrarian investor who believes WBA’s new healthcare initiatives will pay off over time (and that the dividend is safe), it could be worth a closer look. Otherwise, there may be less risky opportunities elsewhere until more clarity emerges on management’s strategy and the company’s ability to stabilize earnings.
Disclaimer:
This stock review has been generated using artificial intelligence and is for informational purposes only. The content provided does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. AI analysis may not account for all market factors, and past performance is not indicative of future results.
Before making any investment decisions, conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial professional. We do not assume any responsibility for losses or damages resulting from the use of this information.Investing in the stock market involves risks, including the loss of principal. Proceed at your own discretion.
Fair Use Disclaimer
The logos and trademarks featured in this stock review are the property of their respective owners. Their use in this content is strictly for informational and editorial purposes, in accordance with fair use principles under applicable copyright and trademark laws. This review is an independent analysis and is not endorsed, sponsored, or affiliated with any of the companies mentioned.
If you are a rights holder and believe that the use of your logo does not comply with fair use, please contact us, and we will address any concerns promptly.
