Magazine about furniture and design
Latest News

1. Valuation Metrics (Score: 8/10) P/E RatioFord’s P/E ratio has historically been on the lower side relative to the overall market and often in line (or slightly cheaper) than major auto peers like General Motors. This suggests the market is pricing in cyclical and execution risks but also ...
READ MORE +
1. Valuation Metrics (Score: 7/10) P/E Ratio: Paramount’s trailing P/E can fluctuate significantly due to cyclical earnings and content investment. Historically, when profits are stable, its P/E has often appeared lower than some larger peers (like Disney or Netflix). However, short-term ...
READ MORE +
1. Valuation Metrics (Score: 4/10) P/E Ratio: MSTR’s earnings are heavily influenced by Bitcoin’s price volatility, and its P/E can swing dramatically (including going negative in some quarters). Compared to traditional software peers, the valuation appears expensive or difficult to interpret ...
READ MORE +

1. Valuation Metrics (Score: 7/10) P/E Ratio: Often trades in the low-to-mid teens—fairly in line with specialty retail peers (Gap, Abercrombie & Fitch, etc.). P/B Ratio: Typically around 1.5–2.0, which is neither extremely cheap nor expensive for an apparel retailer. Dividend Yield: ...
READ MORE +
1. Valuation Metrics (Rating: 4/10) P/E Ratio: ELF’s P/E ratio is relatively high compared to many peers in the cosmetics/beauty industry. Recent strong price performance has stretched valuation multiples, suggesting the stock is trading at a premium. P/B Ratio: Also elevated, reflecting ...
READ MORE +
1. Valuation Metrics (Score: 8/10) P/E Ratio: Volkswagen’s trailing P/E has often hovered in the mid-single digits (e.g., ~5–6x), which is quite low compared to both the broader market and many auto peers. This suggests the market is pricing in cyclical risks or lingering concerns (e.g., ...
READ MORE +
1. Valuation Metrics (Score: 4/10) P/E Ratio: Tesla’s P/E remains high compared to traditional automakers, though it has come down from triple-digit levels in past years. Relative to pure auto industry peers, it’s still expensive. Relative to high-growth technology names, it’s more moderate ...
READ MORE +
1. Valuation Metrics (Score: 8/10) P/E Ratio: QCOM’s trailing P/E hovers around the low-to-mid teens (e.g., ~14–15), which is either in line with or slightly below many peers in the semiconductor industry. Historically, QCOM has traded around a similar multiple, so it does not appear ...
READ MORE +
1. Valuation Metrics (Score: 8/10) P/E Ratio: Pfizer’s trailing and forward P/E ratios are relatively low compared to many peers in big pharma, but keep in mind the recent COVID-driven revenues that are now tapering off. P/B Ratio: Generally around 2–3, in line with or slightly lower than ...
READ MORE +
1. Valuation Metrics (Score: 7/10) P/E Ratio: Baidu’s P/E often trades lower than U.S. large-cap tech (like Google/Alphabet), yet it’s not at ultra-cheap levels compared to some Chinese tech peers. Recent forward P/E estimates hover in the mid-teens to low-20s. P/B Ratio: ...
READ MORE +
1. Valuation Metrics (Score: 8/10) P/E Ratio: Biogen’s P/E (often in the mid-teens) is lower than many biotech peers (which can run much higher due to pipeline bets or negative earnings). Historically, Biogen’s P/E has been around the low-to-mid teens, indicating a relatively moderate ...
READ MORE +
1. Valuation Metrics (Score: 6/10) P/E Ratio: AMD’s P/E ratio is generally higher than the broader semiconductor industry average, reflecting the company’s growth profile but also implying that the stock is not “cheap.” P/B Ratio: Not as critical for chipmakers as for asset-heavy ...
READ MORE +